1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2009 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC70 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC70 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2009 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC70 (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 2009 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Laser | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2870 mm |
