1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2011 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Laser | 2011 Audi TT | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | Laser | TT |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2469 mm |