1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 10 kg more than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Laser | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3010 mm |
