1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML (201 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML (500 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Laser | ML |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1796 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2916 mm |
