1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 295 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Smart |
| Model | Laser | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 1867 mm |
