1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1950 Triumph Roadster
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Triumph Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Triumph Roadster would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 37 kg more than 1950 Triumph Roadster.
Because 1950 Triumph Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Triumph Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1950 Triumph Roadster | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Le Baron | Roadster |
Year Released | 1986 | 1950 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1163 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 54 L |