1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 53 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chrysler | Riley |
| Model | Le Baron | RM A |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2870 mm |
