1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1956 Rover P4
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rover P4 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1956 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1956 Rover P4 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Le Baron | P4 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2636 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1448 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 52 L |