1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 46 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2420 mm |