1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1968 Holden Monaro
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Monaro weights approximately 108 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1968 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1968 Holden Monaro | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Le Baron | Monaro |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |
