1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1968 Rover 2000
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rover 2000 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1968 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1968 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Le Baron | 2000 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2640 mm |