1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1975 Volvo 264
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 264 weights approximately 268 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1975 Volvo 264 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 264. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1975 Volvo 264 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Le Baron | 264 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
