1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1976 Volvo 265
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 265 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1976 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1976 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Le Baron | 265 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |