1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 190 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1997 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Puma |
Year Released | 1986 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 42 L |