1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1999 Acura EL
To start off, 1999 Acura EL is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 103 kg more than 1999 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 1999 Acura EL | |
| Make | Chrysler | Acura |
| Model | Le Baron | EL |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1704 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2619 mm |
