1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 318 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2004 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Le Baron | UTE |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2950 mm |