1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 48 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 Mazda 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |