1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 BMW M3
To start off, 2010 BMW M3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M3 weights approximately 698 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2010 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | BMW |
| Model | Le Baron | M3 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1803 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2761 mm |
