1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Le Baron | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3193 mm |
