1986 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 334 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Le Baron | Transit Connect |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1534 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4587 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2113 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2014 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 58 L |
