1986 Chrysler Limousine vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Limousine is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Limousine. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Limousine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Limousine weights approximately 235 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Limousine, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Limousine | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Limousine | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2750 mm |