1986 Chrysler Limousine vs. 2000 Ford Artic

To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Limousine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Limousine would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Limousine. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Limousine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Limousine weights approximately 102 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.

Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Limousine, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Limousine. (158 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Limousine.

Compare all specifications: