1986 Citroen Aventure vs. 1972 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1986 Citroen Aventure is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (267 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (417 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen Aventure | 1972 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Aventure | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 5753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 417 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
