1986 Citroen Aventure vs. 1976 Mazda 818
To start off, 1986 Citroen Aventure is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen Aventure is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda 818 (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda 818 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Because 1976 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Citroen Aventure (120 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 818. (92 Nm). This means 1986 Citroen Aventure will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen Aventure | 1976 Mazda 818 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Aventure | 818 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
