1986 Citroen Aventure vs. 1989 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1989 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen Aventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen Aventure would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Mustang (89 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Because 1989 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Mustang (176 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 1989 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen Aventure | 1989 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Aventure | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
