1986 Citroen Aventure vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen Aventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen Aventure would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (241 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (320 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure. 2003 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1986 Citroen Aventure has manual transmission. 1986 Citroen Aventure will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen Aventure | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Aventure | C70 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 241 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
