1986 Citroen Aventure vs. 2005 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen Aventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen Aventure would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen Aventure | 2005 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Aventure | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 326 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
