1986 Citroen Aventure vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen Aventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen Aventure would be higher. At 2,318 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (330 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure. 2005 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1986 Citroen Aventure has manual transmission. 1986 Citroen Aventure will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen Aventure | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Aventure | S60 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2318 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
