1986 Citroen Aventure vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen Aventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen Aventure would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen Aventure | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Aventure | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |