1986 Citroen Aventure vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen Aventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen Aventure would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1986 Citroen Aventure has manual transmission. 1986 Citroen Aventure will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen Aventure | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Aventure | 6 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2488 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |