1986 Citroen BX vs. 2000 Lada Samara
To start off, 2000 Lada Samara is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen BX would be higher. At 1,580 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen BX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Citroen BX (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Lada Samara. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Citroen BX should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Samara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Citroen BX (135 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Samara. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Citroen BX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen BX | 2000 Lada Samara | |
Make | Citroen | Lada |
Model | BX | Samara |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 71 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2470 mm |