1986 Citroen BX vs. 2005 Volvo S60

To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen BX would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1986 Citroen BX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 437 kg more than 1986 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen BX. (135 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen BX. 2005 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1986 Citroen BX has manual transmission. 1986 Citroen BX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: