1986 Citroen BX vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen BX would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1986 Citroen BX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen BX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen BX. (135 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen BX | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | BX | Matrix |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |