1986 Citroen C 15 vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C70 weights approximately 895 kg more than 1986 Citroen C 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen C 15 | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C 15 | C70 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |