1986 Citroen C 15 vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1986 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen C 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen C 15 | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C 15 | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 55 L |