1986 Citroen C 15 vs. 2012 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2012 Smart ForTwo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Smart ForTwo (71 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1986 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen C 15.
Because 2012 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Smart ForTwo (125 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen C 15 | 2012 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Citroen | Smart |
| Model | C 15 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
