1986 Citroen C vs. 1967 Fiat Dino
To start off, 1986 Citroen C is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 1,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Fiat Dino (160 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1986 Citroen C. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Fiat Dino should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Fiat Dino weights approximately 235 kg more than 1986 Citroen C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Fiat Dino (172 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen C. (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Fiat Dino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen C | 1967 Fiat Dino | |
| Make | Citroen | Fiat |
| Model | C | Dino |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 57 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2260 mm |
