1986 Citroen C vs. 1996 Ford Ka
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen C would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Citroen C (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Citroen C should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Citroen C weights approximately 37 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Citroen C (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Citroen C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen C | 1996 Ford Ka | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C | Ka |
Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 908 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2450 mm |