1986 Citroen C vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen C would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1986 Citroen C. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 573 kg more than 1986 Citroen C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen C. (110 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen C | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |