1986 Citroen C vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen C would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1986 Citroen C. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1986 Citroen C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (204 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen C. (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen C | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |