1986 Citroen C vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen C would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1986 Citroen C. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 759 kg more than 1986 Citroen C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen C. (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen C | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C | Falcon |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4955 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2838 mm |