1986 Citroen C vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen C would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (228 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1986 Citroen C. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen C.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen C. (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen C | 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | C | SL |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1298 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2560 mm |