1986 Citroen CX vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Citroen CX (114 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Citroen CX weights approximately 475 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Citroen CX (178 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1986 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Citroen | MCC |
Model | CX | Smart |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 84.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2510 mm |