1986 Citroen CX vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Citroen CX (138 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Citroen CX weights approximately 445 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Citroen CX (206 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1986 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1986 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1986 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Citroen CX | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Citroen | MCC |
| Model | CX | Smart |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 47 L |
