1986 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 482 kg more than 1986 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (159 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |