1986 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 255 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (159 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | CX | Commodore |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 159 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |