1986 Citroen CX vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (178 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | CX | Epica |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2700 mm |