1986 Citroen CX vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2261 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |