1986 Citroen CX vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (114 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Citroen CX weights approximately 127 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura CSX (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (178 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2010 Acura CSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | CX | CSX |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2700 mm |