1986 Citroen CX vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 173 more horse power than 1986 Citroen CX. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen CX.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen CX. (159 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen CX. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1986 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1986 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Citroen CX | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | CX | Calais |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 159 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |